Analyze and evaluate Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Analyze and evaluate - Essay ExampleEvidently, the two queries differ in the champion that one ought to be responded to by virtue of proving the existence of paragon while the second already holds the truth of Gods existence yet seeks upshot concerning how Gods qualities may or may not suit the act of deception. On this ground, it follows that the two proofs of Gods existence are inevitably different. To analyze how the synthesis of one proof is distinct from that of the other, in the process, one would be able to figure that besides Gods existence, the properties associated with the existing entity, beingness supreme and infinite in nature, must be utilized to affirm a congruous proposition that God cannot be a deceiver. According to Descartes ontological argument stating The mere Idea of God, proves Gods existence (Descartes First Proof, Med. III) -- God, being a concept, is sufficient proof in itself of His existence and this may be found to acquire strong support from the un shakeable truth I think therefore I am (Med. II) for with this conclusion is the knowledge of the fact that the rational energy of an individual attests to his being and the natural ability to rationalize as such is not without value or consequence so that what is conceived exists as well. Thus, the notion of God in the mind is all that it takes to establish the truth that God does exist though no material or concrete evidence is perceived. Descartes, however, further explicates because I cannot conceive anything but God to whose essence existence necessarily pertains (Descartes Argument in Med. V) and that By the name God, I understand a substance infinite, eternal, immutable, independent, all-knowing, omnipotent (Med. III 22 23). In addition, hence, Descartes acknowledged herein that the encompassing presence of God entails the presence of attributes preconceived or known prior in persona to God on the basis of which, he manages to validate that through Gods perfection, the idea of Gods infinity must have been something plant by God himself (Med. III38) for Descartes argues I should not, however, have the idea of an infinite substance, seeing I am a finite being (Med. III23). Apparently, Descartes requisite the two proofs of Gods existence to be able to substantiate a sound claim that it is not possible for God to deceive the philosopher patronage his finite limits and weakness as a rational human being. Having realized that God is perfect occurs equivalent to having arrived at the thought that deception may just now come from the absolute opposite of perfection which is imperfection (Med. III). Both proofs are of equal significance for in the event God could not be turn out to exist, it is useless to find out the likelihood that he is a deceiver and similarly, it makes no sense to justify Gods existence alone for this would promptly demand investigation of what he is made of in finer details. Rather than operating from different aspects, independ ent of each other, they function go through in hand to strengthen one anothers validity and worth. Secondly, does Descartes give a satisfactory account of human error, given a perfect and divine overlord? Are Descartes arguments convincing, or does it still seem unnecessary and less than perfect that God created us with flaws? Descartes finds error is virtually a moral failing, the willful set of my powers of believing in excess of my